Life of Pi Yann Martel.
This book is: about a boy and a boat.
Other elements: tigers, prairie dogs, turtles, boats, survival, religion, science, biology, human and animal relationships, the human mind.
Read it: if you're interested in zoology, tiger taming, lifeboat survival, or religions. If you enjoy wonderfully precise description.
Overall rating: 8/10
I see this book as having 3 distinct parts. I'd give the first part a 6, the middle a 9.5, and the end a 4. In Beckyland, a place where numbers are flexible, that averages out to an 8.
Martel's writing is excellent, although I was occasionally thrown by the structure/plot of the novel. But that didn't keep me from thoroughly enjoying this book, especially the middle section. That's all I can say without spoilers, so I'm hiding the rest of the review under a jump. If you don't want to know anything about what happens in Life of Pi, stop reading now.
I'm going to keep discussing this novel in three parts, since it felt like three different books to me.
Part 1: Pi's family, their zoo, and several gods.
The reader learns the story of Pi's name, a little bit about his family dynamic, and a lot about his family's zoo. Pi also discovers a fascination with religion of all kinds, and makes forays into several different religious practices simultaneously. I found his comparison of the personalities of the Hindu and Christian deities to be particularly fascinating. That, along with the details about zoo animals, were the high points of this introductory section.
Despite those high points, this first part of the story felt rather fragmented to me and I kept getting bored. That may have partly been because I was sitting there thinking "Isn't there supposed to be a kid in a boat with a tiger? Am I crazy? Where is the boat?" That is my fault, not the book's fault.
Part 2: The boy, the boat, and the tiger.
The reader watches in horrified fascination as the ship carrying Pi's family and a number of their zoo animals goes down, leaving no survivors except for Pi and a few animals (a tiger, a hyena, and a zebra) in a lifeboat. It's not long before Pi and the tiger are alone.
Boy + tiger + lifeboat is an interesting enough starting point to give any author a shot at greatness, but it's the way Mantel writes it that makes this so exceptional. The story proceeds with a clinical precision that gives the reader exact snapshots of the series of events that helps a boy and a tiger survive on a lifeboat for 200-odd days. To call these descriptions vivid would be an understatement.
The religious undertones of the experience of being shipwrecked coupled with the merciless practicality that Pi must implement in order to survive is a fascinating juxtaposition. Pi is conscious of the potential religious significance of the situation and yet his survival is entirely due to his knowledge of zoology and scientific approach to staying alive.
I love that Richard Parker (the tiger) has such a clear personality, and it's not the personality of an anthromorphized kitty cat. He's a wild animal on a boat, and he's dangerous. But he sees the world in a certain way, and because Pi understands tigers he is able to cohabitate with one.
There was one part of this that I didn't love, and that was the encounter with the other blind, shipwreck-ee in a lifeboat. I actually skimmed it until I realized it wasn't a hallucination, because I was so sure it wasn't real. I still don't entirely know what to make of it.
Part 3: Mexico and psychological damage.
Pi and the tiger reach land! Richard Parker bounds off without a backward glance. Pi is rescued and taken to a hospital, where some officials from the Japanese shipping company that owned the sunken ship come to interview him. And then followed my least favorite part of the book.
The two representatives of the shipping company think that Pi lying to them about almost everything. Pi-as-a-child can tell and it's even more obvious to Pi-the-adult-narrator, who has had the Japanese parts of the conversation translated from a transcription. In the face of this skepticism, Pi immediatly provides an alternative version of events.
The alternate story is horrifying,
utterly un-romantic, brutal, articulate, and extremely detailed. Pi tells it
with so little hesitation that the reader is forced to consider the possibility
that there never was a tiger,that perhaps Pi's brain made up the tiger as a way
to spare him from the horror of what really happened.
This non-tiger story raised two main
questions for me: Would Pi be able to come up with this much awful detail on
the spot if the non-tiger version of the story were true? And: if the non-tiger
version of the story is true, and the tiger is a defense-mechanism/delusion,
would he even be able to access the details of the real story through such an
exceptionally complex and powerful delusion?
I still haven't been able to answer
either of those questions and really I'm not sure what to think about the book
overall because of it. I know I loved the tiger story. And I'm trying to be
impressed by Mantel's ability to make his readers fall in love with a story and
then doubt it, but really it doesn't make me very happy.
One of the elements of the tiger
story that the Japanese businessmen find the least believable is the prairie
dog island, which was my absolute favorite moment of the novel. If that wasn't
real in the world of the novel, I don't want to read about it. It's worse than
an "and then she woke up!" ending. I feel betrayed by Pi as a narrator
and I'm confused and upset about it.
Overall, I'm glad I read this and I'd recommend
it to anyone. But I'm very interested to hear what other people thought about
the ending. Did it upset you too? Which story do you think is real?
Don't miss any of the fabulousness! Follow me:
Labels: book review, books
